Yura
05-28-2004, 04:38 AM
Best day to all, friends!
we can all spend much time to pay praisings and anthems to SAW, but sometimes we forget to see the things that make SAW realy far from a market of soundcreation. these things may be not obvious, but they are very
weighty not review on theirs appearing triviality.
Please imagine the high-professional but average sound studio somewhere in the Europe where are a very lot of that kind of studios at this time. I must elaborate. is the SAW conceived to be the instrument to follow its master's
tricks only? or to have characteristic of all way flexible software that signifies
TO WORK IN EVERY STUDIO SETUP, so, I mean SAW would be not only the Master of studio setup but the slave too if conditions (including people with theirs ancient habits and "wisdoms of gray"). Bob, there is an example you can be turned away, but at once miss 1/4 clients of continent (yes, hell with them I say):):
if you will be informed by sound producer or stage manager you must do mastering process only in live mode with essential that he will move all faders
with his fingers only - what to do? it has a place yet! - you start to prepare
the SAW' control mix setup. yes, there are many of midi contr. devices. BUT!
SAW arranged so way there are only TWO (or THREE) that work with SS' EQs, not only with faders and mutes and when everything is ready to go.
I have to own the Macie Control to make the project to move from the dead point. of course, in the others projects where I can dictate my conditions - everything is fine. but does it signify that SAW is flexible smart chap?
The smartest face - the beautiest one.
I get Makie, connect it with SAW and famous sound manager says: I dont like
those faders of Makie... they are not suitable enouth.
Dont laugh, folks! its a reality of life. i exaggerate: I can own my splendid production studio, on my own fantastic genius projects using gears that is perfectly continuation of my body parts, and achive genius results...
but if you start to work with PEOPLE - your stuff can work sometimes fine but sometimes even as scaring away threads betwen all actors.
by the way, that bored here Nuendo has a flexiblty to connect with every
of MIDI control hardware due to its princip of assignin "everything-to-everything", and all it works perfectly. is there envy excessive??
in the real situation described above I must do the one of two: 1)say good-by to man who is owner of his project, so miss the work. or 2) set up SAW to be multitrak player-recorder like old studio tape and let the man to bring his faforite analog mixer for using of live mastering via it. hello again, old times!!! as i did realy!!! as i did!!! But I ask after: what is at all all MIDI-control implements in SAW for? if i must do foolish setup instead? yes I think it's foolish when now is 2004.
another question. very interesting, how many users can vote for SAW to be
monster of sound industry?
we can all spend much time to pay praisings and anthems to SAW, but sometimes we forget to see the things that make SAW realy far from a market of soundcreation. these things may be not obvious, but they are very
weighty not review on theirs appearing triviality.
Please imagine the high-professional but average sound studio somewhere in the Europe where are a very lot of that kind of studios at this time. I must elaborate. is the SAW conceived to be the instrument to follow its master's
tricks only? or to have characteristic of all way flexible software that signifies
TO WORK IN EVERY STUDIO SETUP, so, I mean SAW would be not only the Master of studio setup but the slave too if conditions (including people with theirs ancient habits and "wisdoms of gray"). Bob, there is an example you can be turned away, but at once miss 1/4 clients of continent (yes, hell with them I say):):
if you will be informed by sound producer or stage manager you must do mastering process only in live mode with essential that he will move all faders
with his fingers only - what to do? it has a place yet! - you start to prepare
the SAW' control mix setup. yes, there are many of midi contr. devices. BUT!
SAW arranged so way there are only TWO (or THREE) that work with SS' EQs, not only with faders and mutes and when everything is ready to go.
I have to own the Macie Control to make the project to move from the dead point. of course, in the others projects where I can dictate my conditions - everything is fine. but does it signify that SAW is flexible smart chap?
The smartest face - the beautiest one.
I get Makie, connect it with SAW and famous sound manager says: I dont like
those faders of Makie... they are not suitable enouth.
Dont laugh, folks! its a reality of life. i exaggerate: I can own my splendid production studio, on my own fantastic genius projects using gears that is perfectly continuation of my body parts, and achive genius results...
but if you start to work with PEOPLE - your stuff can work sometimes fine but sometimes even as scaring away threads betwen all actors.
by the way, that bored here Nuendo has a flexiblty to connect with every
of MIDI control hardware due to its princip of assignin "everything-to-everything", and all it works perfectly. is there envy excessive??
in the real situation described above I must do the one of two: 1)say good-by to man who is owner of his project, so miss the work. or 2) set up SAW to be multitrak player-recorder like old studio tape and let the man to bring his faforite analog mixer for using of live mastering via it. hello again, old times!!! as i did realy!!! as i did!!! But I ask after: what is at all all MIDI-control implements in SAW for? if i must do foolish setup instead? yes I think it's foolish when now is 2004.
another question. very interesting, how many users can vote for SAW to be
monster of sound industry?