Close

Search:

Type: Posts; User: ckuemmel

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    47
    Views
    13,553

    Re: Integrated Cross Delay

    You are right. It would bring problems. That is one point why the delay is the minor part in InnovasonĀ“s Pandora
  2. Replies
    47
    Views
    13,553

    Re: Integrated Cross Delay

    I will speak with Lawo about that. Right in the moment there are no plans. It is too new
  3. Replies
    47
    Views
    13,553

    Re: Integrated Cross Delay

    Thank you for your hints. I have RME and will check it out the next days.
  4. Replies
    47
    Views
    13,553

    Re: Integrated Cross Delay

    I do not want to make you angry and as I said, nothing against your method. It***180;s cool when people try to imrpove things. I just think that pure delay, which needs big times, has some weak points....
  5. Replies
    47
    Views
    13,553

    Re: Integrated Cross Delay

    [quote]

    That***180;s why there is Pandora.

    @Yogi: Nothing against your method.
    I only say that Pandora is working different and has some big advantages e.g. in a typical Mainhang (left signal) -...
  6. Replies
    47
    Views
    13,553

    Re: Integrated Cross Delay

    www.tonmeister-online.de/video.html
  7. Replies
    47
    Views
    13,553

    Re: Integrated Cross Delay

    [quote]

    No it isn***180;t. You are right, when you say that you will have combfilters anyway. But you speak about 1k or 2k. But a delay of 20ms has the first cancellation at 25Hz, then at 75Hz at 125...
  8. Replies
    47
    Views
    13,553

    Re: Integrated Cross Delay

    Hi, as Tomy said. The delay is only one part, because it would not work in big relations. What happens if I would put 20ms on it. Besides the fact that people in the middle would already hear an echo...
Results 1 to 8 of 8