Close

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 60
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bainbridge Island, WA
    Posts
    2,064

    Default OT: "Splitting" a Mic

    I just want to make sure I'm not creating problems with a proposed setup:

    I have 4 piano inputs - 2 mics and 2 transducers - that I want to split between an on-stage mixer for use by a pianist, and the house snake for use by a monitor console and an FOH console.

    I could buy a splitter box, or I could go a cheaper way and use XLR Y-cables.

    My understanding is that if the on-stage mixer (Mackie, e.g.) and the monitor and FOH consoles all have transformers on their mic inputs, then there will be no issues with loading down the mics. IOW, the Y-cable approach should be fine, and I don't need a splitter box (Whirlwind, ART, Radial, etc) which would be a LOT more expensive and bulkier to carry around.

    Care to comment?

  2. Default Re: OT: "Splitting" a Mic

    It should be fine.

    Any reason the mics can't just be fed back to the pianist's mixer via a feed from the monitor mixer?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bainbridge Island, WA
    Posts
    2,064

    Default Re: OT: "Splitting" a Mic

    Quote Originally Posted by airickess View Post
    It should be fine.

    Any reason the mics can't just be fed back to the pianist's mixer via a feed from the monitor mixer?
    Thanks.
    The pianist wants individual EQ, pan and level control over a blend of mics and pickups - in this case, 3 Helpinstill pickups, 2 mics and 2 Accusound or Schertler pickups. And I don't want to have to give the monitor engineer more work than is necessary. We don't carry our own monitor engineer, so the less s/he has to worry about, the better.

  4. #4

    Default Re: OT: "Splitting" a Mic

    If you're using SAC, you can create a monitor board, source those feed at PRE SRC, and send all the channels on their own outs at 0 gain with no changes ot the piano player's personal mixer. Even though the board setup in SAC is more complicated, the wiring is significantly simpler and your signal path is clean.
    Jim King
    SSR Sound
    http://www.ssrrentals.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bainbridge Island, WA
    Posts
    2,064

    Default Re: OT: "Splitting" a Mic

    Quote Originally Posted by ssrsound View Post
    If you're using SAC, you can create a monitor board, source those feed at PRE SRC, and send all the channels on their own outs at 0 gain with no changes ot the piano player's personal mixer. Even though the board setup in SAC is more complicated, the wiring is significantly simpler and your signal path is clean.
    Thanks Jim.
    With the setup I'm planning, the piano player can work completely independently from the monitor engineer. He doesn' have to wait for any other gear to be set up (SAC) other than his own "station", which he'll take care of. Much cleaner, simpler and leaves more time for the monitor engineer to deal with the other musos.

  6. #6

    Default Re: OT: "Splitting" a Mic

    Fair enough.

    If you're using a decent personal mixer for the pianist, you could also run his mics into his board, and take direct outs from the board into your snake. Of course this presumes that the direct outs are pre-gain/pre-fader.
    Jim King
    SSR Sound
    http://www.ssrrentals.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Posts
    2,460

    Default Re: OT: "Splitting" a Mic

    Splitter box, specifically with ground lifts might be nice to have. Most often it shouldn't be a problem, but you never know.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, N.M.
    Posts
    1,105

    Default Re: OT: "Splitting" a Mic

    Quote Originally Posted by ssrsound View Post
    Fair enough.

    If you're using a decent personal mixer for the pianist, you could also run his mics into his board, and take direct outs from the board into your snake. Of course this presumes that the direct outs are pre-gain/pre-fader.
    Taking an educated guess here, but is there a reason you couldn't take signal from the first click (unbalanced, I believe) via the channel inserts? All my Mackie consoles have inserts on all channels, so I assume your piano player does, too. This plan would not require transformers only if your A/D/A converters reside on the stage, which, in theory, could be placed right next to the Mackie console.

    Any reason this wouldn't work?
    DF

    http://soundaddy.com

    Intel DG965OT Motherboard (11/17/08) - Intel P4 LGA-775 651 (Cedar Mill) 3.4GHz CPU
    2.0GB 800Mhz RAM - 40GB Intel X25-V SSD - 500GB SATA "Spinner"

    RME HDSP 9652 (x2 - 1 spare) - Behringer ADA8000 (x5 - 2 spares)
    CM MotorMix (x3 - Host system) - Behringer BCF-2000 (Remote system)


  9. #9

    Default Re: OT: "Splitting" a Mic

    Quote Originally Posted by IraSeigel View Post
    I could buy a splitter box, or I could go a cheaper way and use XLR Y-cables.
    As someone else mentioned, a splitter box would give you ground lifts at additional cost, or Y cables would be fine and you could workout any ground loops with other options.

    But, transformers will not prevent "loading". Your signal will drop by 3db at each split.

    Soundguy

  10. #10

    Default Re: OT: "Splitting" a Mic

    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie Frank View Post
    Taking an educated guess here, but is there a reason you couldn't take signal from the first click (unbalanced, I believe) via the channel inserts?
    Convenient perhaps, but not good engineering practice. Besides being a dodgy connection, you would be feeding the output of a cheap Mackie preamp to the stage monitors and FOH. Better to go clean.

    I have a couple of 12 channel Mackies laying around and they only have inserts on 4 of the 12 channels, FWIW.

    Soundguy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •