Close

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Maybe OT

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Richmond, Kentucky
    Posts
    195

    Default Maybe OT

    Audio 'instructions' for a file I am to process. Levels should be plus and minus 6db at -18 db. OK so no higher than -12 db and no lower than -24 db. But when I process the file (Levelizer) it seems to be very low. I am confused about the actual meter labels. Is 0 zero? I remember -12 is 0 on DAT units years ago. Oh well just throwing it out for somebody to explain it to me.!

  2. #2

    Default Re: Maybe OT

    I think zero is zero, the top of the digital scale, 0dBFS. But on the Sonoris meter, for example, zero is a moving target. Depending on which scale I choose, zero is -12, -14, or -20. I ignore this user-chosen silliness and stick with zero is zero.

    As for the level after processing with a compressor or limiter, you just need some makeup gain. On the Levelizer, makeup gain or output level is right below the blue triangle on the right. Use the comp/lim to get the dynamic range you need. With a range of 12 dB, I don't know how much limiting you need, btw. Then use the makeup gain to center the level at -18.

    If you have the levelizer patched prefader, you can also use the MT fader to get the level centered at -18. If the initial levels were really low, you may have to use both.

    HTH.
    Ian Alexander
    VO Talent/Audio Producer
    www.IanAlexander.com

  3. #3

    Default Re: Maybe OT

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve L View Post
    I remember -12 is 0 on DAT units years ago. Oh well just throwing it out for somebody to explain it to me.!
    That would not be correct. Depending upon which DAT you reference, 0= -18 or -20.
    "We have a situation where somebody has learned that 'tape' sounds good. Tape doesn't sound good. Tape sounds like crap. But sometimes good stuff gets put on tape." "Putting crap to tape...sounds like crap."

    Show business: we're all here because we're not all there.

    Resistance is not futile. It is voltage divided by current.

    "I do not think that the wireless waves I have discovered will have any practical application,..." Heinrich Rudolf Hertz

  4. #4

    Default Re: Maybe OT

    This "zero confusion" is why we use more than just the number.

    "0 dBfs" means "zero decibels below full scale". Inside any digital system, it is the most convenient, because the number tells you "how far below SPLAT!".

    "0 VU" is not as well-defined relative to the actual signal. It comes from when the old mechanical "Volume Unit" meter was the industry standard, and all experienced engineers knew how to use it to help them set levels. For the meter itself, it represents a certain voltage, but in actual use, it is a completely arbitrary standard, depending on what the system designer wanted. When the film sound guys went digital, they agreed on a standard that said
    "0 VU = -20 dBfs".

    When you are trying to give a client something with a consistent "loudness", it gets tricky. The straight-up peak meters used in SAW don't tell you how loud it SOUNDS. For seeing how "loud" my mixes are, I like to use the K-metering system developed by Bob Katz. It shows me both peak and average levels at a glance, and I find that matching average levels between mixes works pretty well. The Sonoris meters have this option.

    HTH
    Cary B. Cornett
    aka "Puzzler"
    www.chinesepuzzlerecording.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •